Industrial validation of a poka-yoke system to prevent defects in stamped metal components
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29105/mdi.v14i24.369Keywords:
metal stamping, Poka-Yoke, defect prevention, Lean Manufacturing, quality assuranceAbstract
Defect prevention in stamped components requires mechanisms capable of acting directly at the source without substantially increasing process complexity. This study aimed to design, implement, and evaluate a mechanical Poka-Yoke device to prevent the release of parts missing a critical hole. An applied before-and-after design was employed, integrating production records, root-cause analysis, CAD development, CNC machining, and functional inspection. Baseline data showed 630 nonconforming parts out of approximately 35,000 components produced per month (1.8%). The available post-implementation monitoring period covered five months and 175,000 inspected parts, with no documented escapes of the targeted defect. With zero observed events, the one-sided 95% exact binomial upper confidence limit was approximately 0.0017% (17.1 ppm). Direct timing of 30 positioning, verification, and release cycles using the Poka-Yoke yielded a mean cycle time of 54.91 ± 2.79 s/cycle (95% CI: 53.87–55.95 s; range: 50.11–60.53 s).
The attribute-based R&R validation involved 200 reference parts (100 conforming and 100 with the critical hole intentionally absent), three operators, and two repetitions, resulting in 1,200 evaluations. The assessment yielded 591 true positives, 600 true negatives, nine false negatives, and no false positives, corresponding to an overall sensitivity of 98.50%, specificity of 100.00%, accuracy of 99.25%, false-negative rate of 1.50%, and false-positive rate of 0.00%. The device required an initial investment of approximately MXN 2,000, compared with an estimated annual cost of MXN 100,000 for additional manual inspection. Under the stated assumptions, the first-year simple return on investment (ROI) was 4,900%, with a payback period of 0.02 years.
References
Antony, J., McDermott, O., & Sony, M. (2022). Quality 4.0 conceptualisation and theoretical understanding: a global exploratory qualitative study. The TQM Journal, 34(5), 1169–1188. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-07-2021-0215
Antony, J., McDermott, O., Sony, M., Toner, A., Bhat, S., Cudney, E., & Doulatabadi, M. (2023). Benefits, challenges, critical success factors and motivations of Quality 4.0: A qualitative global study. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 34(7–8), 827–846. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2022.2113737
Antony, J., Sony, M., Furterer, S., McDermott, O., & Pepper, M. (2022). Quality 4.0 and its impact on organizational performance: An integrative viewpoint. The TQM Journal, 34(6), 2069–2084. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-08-2021-0242
Antony, J., Sony, M., McDermott, O., Jayaraman, R., & Flynn, D. (2023). An exploration of organizational readiness factors for Quality 4.0: An intercontinental study and future research directions. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 40(2), 582–606. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-10-2021-0357
Brandenburger, J., Schirm, C., Melcher, J., Hancke, E., Vannucci, M., Colla, V., Cateni, S., Sellami, R., Dupont, S., Majchrowski, A., & Arteaga, A. (2020). Quality4.0—Transparent product quality supervision in the age of Industry 4.0. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.06502
Gal, B., Madreiter, T., Scheder, N., Liesinger, E., Hold, P., & Schlund, S. (2024). Expanding the boundaries of Zero-Defect Manufacturing: A systematic literature review. Procedia CIRP, 122, 336–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2024.01.050
Hernández Chávez, G., & Hernández Chávez, Y. (2024). ¿Qué es la Calidad 4.0? Una revisión de la literatura. Ingeniería Industrial, 46, 129–149. https://doi.org/10.26439/ing.ind2024.n046.6890
Hoffmann, R., & Reich, C. (2023). A systematic literature review on artificial intelligence and explainable artificial intelligence for visual quality assurance in manufacturing. Electronics, 12(22), 4572. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12224572
Hossain, M. M., & Purdy, G. (2024). Role of Industry 4.0 in zero-defect manufacturing: A systematic literature review and a conceptual framework for future research directions. Manufacturing Letters, 41, 1696–1707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mfglet.2024.09.197
Markatos, N. G., & Mousavi, A. (2023). Manufacturing quality assessment in the industry 4.0 era: A review. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 34(13–14), 1655–1681. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2023.2194524
Pachimuthu, D., Pinzone, M., & Taisch, M. (2024). Assessing Zero-Defect Manufacturing maturity: A review of the state of the art. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 58(19), 899–904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2024.09.167
Powell, D., Magnanini, M. C., Colledani, M., & Myklebust, O. (2022). Advancing Zero Defect Manufacturing: A state-of-the-art perspective and future research directions. Computers in Industry, 136, 103596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2021.103596
Psarommatis, F., May, G., & Azamfirei, V. (2024). Zero defect manufacturing in 2024: A holistic literature review for bridging the gaps and forward outlook. International Journal of Production Research, 64(17), 7395–7431. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2024.2388217
Saihi, A., Awad, M. M., & Ben-Daya, M. (2023). Quality 4.0: Leveraging Industry 4.0 technologies to improve quality management practices—a systematic review. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 40(2), 628–650. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-09-2021-0305
Sony, M., Antony, J., & Douglas, J. A. (2020). Essential ingredients for the implementation of Quality 4.0: A narrative review of literature and future directions for research. The TQM Journal, 32(4), 779–793. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-12-2019-0275
Sony, M., Antony, J., Douglas, J. A., & McDermott, O. (2021). Motivations, barriers and readiness factors for Quality 4.0 implementation: An exploratory study. The TQM Journal, 33(6), 1502–1515. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-11-2020-0272
Souza, F. F., Corsi, A., Pagani, R. N., Balbinotti, G., & Kovaleski, J. L. (2022). Total Quality Management 4.0: Adapting quality management to Industry 4.0. The TQM Journal, 34(4), 749–769. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-10-2020-0238
Widjajanto, S., Purba, H. H., & Jaqin, S. C. (2020). Novel Poka-Yoke approaching toward Industry 4.0: A literature review. Operational Research in Engineering Sciences: Theory and Applications, 3(3), 65–83. https://doi.org/10.31181/oresta20303065w
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
