Methodological improvement for risk and opportunity analysis under ISO 9001:2015 in a higher education institution
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29105/mdi.v14i23.358Keywords:
risk management, ISO 9001:2015, quality management system, continuous improvement, higher education, nonconformity, internal auditAbstract
ISO 9001:2015 introduced risk-based thinking as a cross-cutting element of quality management systems, requiring organizations to identify, evaluate, and address risks and opportunities that may affect their objectives. In higher education institutions undergoing organizational transitions, operationalizing this requirement may present systemic gaps that lead to auditable nonconformities. This paper documents the diagnosis, design, and implementation of a process-based risk and opportunity analysis methodology within the Integrated Management System (SGI) of the School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering (FIME) at the Autonomous University of Nuevo León (UANL), in response to findings identified during internal and external audits conducted in 2021. Using a qualitative research approach, the Five Whys and One How tool was applied to determine the root cause of the nonconformity, identifying that the absence of a clear and comprehensible methodology for the new organizational structure —which had renewed 80% of its process owners— constituted the origin of the problem. A four-activity Corrective Action Plan was designed and a standardized Risk Analysis Matrix was developed for all SGI processes. Results show that all four activities were completed at 100%, the finding was closed during Internal Audit No. 40, and the research hypothesis was confirmed. The study provides evidence on the relevance of participatory and structured methodologies for strengthening quality management system maturity in university contexts with high staff turnover.
References
Bisgaard, S. (2008). Quality management and the legacy of Juran. Quality Engineering, 20(1), 13–25.
Campbell, J. P. (2018). ISO 9001:2015: The evolution and convergence of quality management and knowledge management for competitive advantage. Quality Engineering, 30(1), 1–15.
CERTIFICACIÓN, I. C. (2018). Gestión del Riesgo – Directrices NTC ISO 31000:2018. Instituto Colombiano de Normas Técnicas y Certificación.
Dean, J. W., & Bowen, D. E. (1994). El papel de los gerentes de calidad en las organizaciones contemporáneas. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 13(2), 394.
Excellence, T. Q. (2019). Assessment of ISO 9001:2015 implementation: Focus on risk management approach requirements compliance in an automotive company. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 30(sup1), 1–15.
Journal of Production Research. (2013). Mejora continua en la planta de fabricación de Toyota: aplicaciones de herramientas de resolución de problemas. International Journal of Production Research, 51(23), 7100–7117.
Madzík, M. H. (2015). A 3D view of issues of quality in higher education. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 26(3–4), 294–306.
Marde, S. (2015). The contribution of ISO 9001 to certified companies: Manager and employee perceptions. Quality Management Journal, 22(4), 45–61.
Paor, C. de. (2016). The contribution of professional accreditation to quality assurance in higher education. Quality in Higher Education, 22(2), 179–194.
Reid, R. A., Koljonen, E. L., & Buell, B. (1999). El ciclo Deming ofrece un marco para la gestión del proceso medioambientalmente responsable. Quality Engineering, 11(2), 16.
Shah, A. P. (2016). Defining the quality of higher education around ethics and moral values. Quality in Higher Education, 22(3), 211–226.
Solis Reyes, O. D. (2021). Mejora en el análisis para la gestión de riesgos y oportunidades para ISO 9001:2015 [Tesis de Ingeniería Mecánico Eléctrica]. Facultad de Ingeniería Mecánica y Eléctrica, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León.
Sónia Cardoso, M. J., Rosa, M. J., & Santos, C. S. (2015). Why is quality in higher education not achieved? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(6), 893–909.
Ying-Kei Tse, & Kim Hua Tan. (2011). Managing product quality risk in a multi-tier global supply chain. International Journal of Production Research, 49(1), 139–158
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
