Integration of Critical Digital Literacy in Engineering Education: An Integrative Review with a Sociotechnical Approach

Authors

  • Roxana Colunga Jaime Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León image/svg+xml
  • Lizette Berenice González Martínez Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29105/mdi.v14i23.356

Keywords:

critical digital literacy, engineering education, integrative review, sociotechnical training, critical digital competence

Abstract

Digital transformation is redefining professional practices in the field of engineering, demanding not only advanced technical skills but also critical capacities for the responsible use of emerging technologies. In this context, the aim of this article is to systematize and critically analyze the main lines of debate surrounding critical digital literacy in engineering education, based on an integrative review of recent literature.

Methodologically, a thematic analysis of academic studies published between 2015 and 2024 was conducted, allowing for the identification of conceptual patterns and emerging trends in the field. The results reveal the predominance of instrumental approaches in digital training, as well as the limited cross-cutting incorporation of ethical and reflective dimensions in curricula.

Based on these findings, a conceptual framework is proposed that integrates technical, ethical, and reflective dimensions as the foundation for a critical sociotechnical approach to engineering education. It is concluded that critical digital literacy constitutes a strategic axis for strengthening the professional profile of contemporary engineers and guiding their responsible engagement with current technological challenges.

Author Biographies

Roxana Colunga Jaime , Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León

Profesora de Tiempo Completo de la Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León.

Lizette Berenice González Martínez , Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León

Profesora de tiempo completo de la Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León.

References

Area, M., & Pessoa, T. (2012). De lo sólido a lo líquido: Las nuevas alfabetizaciones ante los cambios culturales de la Web 2.0. Comunicar, 38, 13–20. https://doi.org/10.3916/C38-2012-02-01

Barnett, R. (2018). The ecological university: A feasible utopia. Routledge.

Bawden, D. (2008). Origins and concepts of digital literacy. En C. Lankshear & M. Knobel (Eds.), Digital literacies: Concepts, policies and practices (pp. 17–32). Peter Lang.

Biesta, G. (2015). What is education for? On good education, teacher judgement, and educational professionalism. European Journal of Education, 50(1), 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12109

Buckingham, D. (2015). Defining digital literacy—What do young people need to know about digital media? Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 10(Jubilee Issue), 21–35.

Cabero-Almenara, J., Barroso-Osuna, J., & Llorente-Cejudo, C. (2021). Competencia digital docente en educación superior: Una revisión sistemática. Revista de Educación a Distancia, 21(67), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.6018/red.476531

Castells, M. (2010). The rise of the network society (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.

Crovi, D. (2019). Ciudadanía digital y educación superior en América Latina. Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, 17(2), 45–60.

Ferrari, A. (2013). DIGCOMP: A framework for developing and understanding digital competence in Europe. European Commission Joint Research Centre.

Floridi, L. (2019). The logic of information: A theory of philosophy as conceptual design. Oxford University Press.

Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2011). New literacies: Everyday practices and social learning (3rd ed.). Open University Press.

López-Meneses, E., Sirignano, F. M., & Vázquez-Cano, E. (2020). Digital competence in higher education: A systematic review. Sustainability, 12(12), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12125006

Morin, E. (1999). Los siete saberes necesarios para la educación del futuro. UNESCO.

Redecker, C. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators (DigCompEdu). European Commission.

Selwyn, N. (2016). Education and technology: Key issues and debates. Bloomsbury.

UNESCO. (2018). A global framework of reference on digital literacy skills. UNESCO Institute for Statistics.

UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. UNESCO.

World Economic Forum. (2020). The future of jobs report 2020. https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-future-of-jobs-report-2020

World Economic Forum. (2023). The future of jobs report 2023. https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-future-of-jobs-report-2023

Whittemore, R., & Knafl, K. (2005). The integrative review: Updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52(5), 546–553. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x

Torraco, R. J. (2005). Writing integrative literature reviews: Guidelines and examples. Human Resource Development Review, 4(3), 356–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484305278283

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Published

2026-04-30

How to Cite

Colunga Jaime , R., & González Martínez , L. B. (2026). Integration of Critical Digital Literacy in Engineering Education: An Integrative Review with a Sociotechnical Approach. Multidisciplinas De La Ingeniería, 14(23), 48–58. https://doi.org/10.29105/mdi.v14i23.356